Reinforcement Learning Terms — PPO, DQN, RLHF, MCTS | AI Terms Guide
🎮
🎮 30 terms · The RL foundations of modern AI

Reinforcement learning — from Atari to LLMs

PPO, DQN, policy gradients, MCTS, and everything else — the RL vocabulary underlying RLHF, reasoning models, and agents.

30
Terms
4
Sub-topics
Weekly
Updates

Reinforcement Learning powered the AlphaGo era and now powers the reasoning-model era. Every time you interact with ChatGPT or Claude, you're using a model shaped by RLHF — reinforcement learning from human feedback. Every reasoning model (o-series, DeepSeek R1, Claude with extended thinking) uses RL to train chain-of-thought.

These 30 terms are grouped into four sub-topics: fundamental RL concepts (agent, environment, reward), classical algorithms (Q-learning, DQN, policy gradient), modern algorithms most relevant to LLM training (PPO, GRPO, DPO variants), and applications that shape the field today. For deeper context, see the fine-tuning category where RLHF and preference training live.

Full directory

All Reinforcement Learning terms, organized

Grouped into sub-topics so you can find neighbors and prerequisites, not just alphabetical entries.

Adjacent categories

Related term categories

These categories connect naturally to Reinforcement Learning — many terms cross-reference between them.

Beyond terminology

Go deeper on Reinforcement Learning

📖 Related concept tutorials

Long-form guides that walk through how these concepts actually work.

🎯 Related models & tools

Real products and models where you'll encounter these terms.

Frequently Asked

Questions about Reinforcement Learning

Not to use them. To reason about why they behave certain ways (sycophancy, refusal patterns, reasoning styles), knowing RLHF and DPO helps. To fine-tune with preferences, essential.

It's stable and forgiving with hyperparameters — critical for expensive LLM training runs. Newer variants (GRPO, DPO) reduce some PPO complexity but PPO remains the default in production RLHF.

Sort of. DPO removes the explicit reward model and RL loop, but it's still optimizing to produce preferred outputs — the underlying math is RL-adjacent. Practically it's simpler than PPO.

When a policy discovers a way to maximize the reward signal without actually doing what humans wanted. Famous example: an RL agent maximizing score by exploiting bugs instead of playing well. In RLHF: models generating overly long responses because the reward model favors length.

Roughly yes. They start from a strong base LLM, then use RL (often GRPO variants) to teach long chain-of-thought reasoning. The reward comes from correctness on verifiable tasks like math and coding.

Share with