Fine-tuning Methods — LoRA, QLoRA, RLHF, DPO, GRPO Explained | AI Terms Guide
🔧
🔧 50 terms · Every fine-tuning method

Every way to fine-tune an LLM

SFT, LoRA, QLoRA, DPO, GRPO, RLHF, and everything in between — every technique for adapting a pretrained model to your use case, with when to use each.

50
Terms
4
Sub-topics
Weekly
Updates

Fine-tuning is how you take a general-purpose foundation model and specialize it for your task, domain, style, or safety requirements. The last three years have seen an explosion of fine-tuning methods — LoRA and QLoRA made it affordable, RLHF and DPO made it aligned, and GRPO and reasoning-focused methods pushed the frontier.

These 50 terms are grouped into four sub-topics: parameter-efficient methods (LoRA family), instruction and preference training (SFT, RLHF, DPO), reinforcement-learning methods for reasoning (PPO, GRPO), and the data-preparation vocabulary you need to run any of it. For the big picture, see our How Fine-Tuning Works tutorial and the RAG vs Fine-tuning comparison.

Full directory

All Fine-tuning Methods terms, organized

Grouped into sub-topics so you can find neighbors and prerequisites, not just alphabetical entries.

Beyond terminology

Go deeper on Fine-tuning Methods

📖 Related concept tutorials

Long-form guides that walk through how these concepts actually work.

🎯 Related models & tools

Real products and models where you'll encounter these terms.

Frequently Asked

Questions about Fine-tuning Methods

Usually RAG first. Fine-tune when you need consistent style, a specific format, or knowledge that's hard to retrieve. Often the answer is both — see our RAG vs Fine-tuning comparison.

QLoRA on a small open-weight model. For 7B-8B parameter models, you can fine-tune on a single consumer GPU. For 70B+, still one GPU with QLoRA — training just takes longer.

No. LoRA can produce meaningful adaptation with 100-1,000 high-quality examples. Full fine-tuning usually wants more. Quality matters more than quantity — one great example beats ten mediocre ones.

Not always, but often. DPO is much simpler and cheaper. RLHF has more knobs to tune and can achieve slightly better quality on complex preferences. For most teams, DPO is the practical choice.

OpenAI offers fine-tuning for some GPT models. Anthropic offers fine-tuning through partners. Most cutting-edge fine-tuning research happens on open-weight models — Llama, Mistral, Qwen — because you have full control.

Share with