AI Agent Terms — MCP, Tool Use, ReAct, Agentic Loops Explained | AI Terms Guide
🤖
🤖 50 terms · The vocabulary of AI agents

AI agents — every term explained

MCP, tool use, ReAct, agentic loops, planners, and multi-agent systems. Every term you need to build, deploy, or reason about agentic AI in 2026.

50
Terms
4
Sub-topics
Weekly
Updates

AI agents are the fastest-moving area of applied AI in 2026. An agent is an LLM that can take actions in the world — call APIs, browse the web, edit files, run code, delegate to other agents — through tool use. The Model Context Protocol (MCP), introduced by Anthropic and now adopted across major providers, has standardized how agents connect to tools.

The 50 terms in this category are grouped into four sub-topics: core agent concepts (what makes something 'agentic'), the tools and protocols they use (MCP, function calling, computer use), planning and reasoning patterns (ReAct, tree-of-thoughts, planner-executor), and the frameworks people build agents with. For deep coverage of MCP servers and Skills, see our sister site Skills and Servers.

Full directory

All AI Agents terms, organized

Grouped into sub-topics so you can find neighbors and prerequisites, not just alphabetical entries.

Beyond terminology

Go deeper on AI Agents

📖 Related concept tutorials

Long-form guides that walk through how these concepts actually work.

🎯 Related models & tools

Real products and models where you'll encounter these terms.

Frequently Asked

Questions about AI Agents

A chatbot responds to messages. An agent takes actions — calls APIs, edits files, browses the web, delegates to other agents. Every agent is a chatbot under the hood, but not every chatbot is an agent.

Not replacing — layered on top. Function calling is the low-level LLM capability. MCP is a protocol for servers to expose tools that clients (using function calling under the hood) can consume. See MCP vs Function Calling.

No. Simple agents can be built with just the provider SDK (Anthropic, OpenAI) and function calling. Frameworks help with orchestration, memory, and complex flows. Start simple; adopt a framework when the complexity actually appears.

For narrow, well-scoped tasks: yes. For open-ended autonomous behavior: still risky. The current sweet spot is agents with clear boundaries — coding agents, research agents, customer-support triage — where the action space is constrained.

Task success rate on a defined benchmark (SWE-bench for coding, WebArena for browsing) plus operational metrics — tokens used, tools called, time to completion, error recovery rate. See our evaluation category.

Share with